Breaking News: Presidential Election Tribunal, Abba Kyari in trouble for procuring Fake Cambridge Statement of result for President Buhari

The Chief of Staff (CoS) to President Muhammadu Buhari is trouble for procuring fake Cambridge statement of result in aid of his boss’s defense at the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal. 

One patriotic Lawyer, Mr. Kalu Kalu Agu, Esq., after series of investigations at the prestigious Cambridge university in the United Kingdom, discovered that the said statement of result was fake and has petitioned Mr. Abba Kyari to the Metropolitan Police. The letter with Ref N0; Nr VE261478815GB was received and signed for by T.GAMBLE Esq of the Metropolitan Police at 8.52 am on Friday,16-08-2019

Mr. Abba Kyari, in his desperation to support his boss, employed the services of black marketeers (aka Oluwole), to procure the said fake statement of result (as attached), which was presented to the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal by the lead counsel to the 2nd Respondent, Chief Wole Olanipekun. 

During cross examination at the trial, Mr. Kyari confirmed to the court that he personally signed and collected the said fake statement of result on behalf of his boss, President Muhammadu Buhari on the 18th of July 2019, after the conclusion of the Presidential Election on February 23, 2019. 

He also confirmed to the court that the purported Cambridge assessment international education certified statement of result was not listed on President Buhari’s Curriculum Vitae he submitted to the 1st Respondent, INEC before the election. 

Recall that this same fake Cambridge assessment statement of result was presented to the WAEC Deputy Registrar, Dr. Adewumi, who was Subpoenaed to testify for President Buhari at the Presidential Tribunal, Mr. Adewumi informed the court that he does not recognize the statement of result, even though on the paper, it reads that it was done in collaboration with WASC.

Asked by the Petitioners’s counsel if the statement of result is in tandem with WAEC? He responded that he does not know how and where the document emanated from. That his signature is not on the document and that the document does not carry WAEC authorization. 

Comments

comments